Further Testing of Astrology

Chapter index in this window —   — Chapter index in separate window

What other tests of astrology can you come up with? Perhaps you might try setting up a study of astrology predictions with your classmates and friends. Ask them about what happened to them yesterday and then compare that to what the horoscope in the newspaper said should have happened. Should you look at their horoscope before you ask them what happened? Would that bias how you interpret what they tell you or would it help you ask appropriate questions to jog their memory? If your astronomy class is large enough and everyone in the class is involved in the study, you will probably have several people sharing the same zodiac sign and comparisons can be made. Be sure to keep track of both positive and negative results. You will need to decide how much of the horoscope prediction should be valid (the whole thing or at least one point?). Your astronomy professor may have other suggestions for possible tests.

For Further Exploration

1. Andrew Fraknoi's Astrology Defense Kit. Select the link to view it in a new window.
2. Andrew Fraknoi's pseudoscience bibliography. Select the link to view it in a new window.
3. Kendrick Frazier's article in Skeptical Inquirer vol. 10, Spring 1986 ``Double-blind Test of Astrology Avoids Bias, Still Refutes the Astrological Hypothesis''. Reprinted in The Outer Edge p. 40, eds. Nickell, Karr, & Genoni (CSICOP, Inc., 1996).
4. Ray Hyman's article in The Zetetic Spring/Summer 1977 ```Cold Reading': How to Convince Strangers That You Know All About Them''. Reprinted in The Outer Edge p. 70.
5. Paul Kurtz's and Andrew Fraknoi's article in Skeptical Inquirer vol. 9, Spring 1985 ``Scientific Tests of Astrology Do Not Support Its Claims''. Reprinted in The Outer Edge p. 36.

Go back to previous section -- Go to next section

Go to Astronomy Notes home

last updated: 03 May 2001